Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Then I no longer undersrand what we are talking about. OK, no worries. I was just hoping you'd twig what I'm clumsily trying to get at, but I'll have to write it up properly some time. - Julian
- Subversion semantics: no no-op changes Julian Foad
- Re: Subversion semantics: no no-op changes Daniel Shahaf
- Re: Subversion semantics: no no-op changes Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Subversion semantics: no no-op changes Julian Foad
- Re: Subversion semantics: no no-op changes Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Subversion semantics: no no-op change... Julian Foad
- Re: Subversion semantics: no no-op changes Johan Corveleyn
- Re: Subversion semantics: no no-op changes Branko Čibej
- Re: Subversion semantics: no no-op changes Julian Foad
- Re: Subversion semantics: no no-op change... Branko Čibej