On 09.04.2019 17:53, Julian Foad wrote: > Branko Čibej wrote on 2019-04-09: >> Is there a reason why this would be hidden away in 'svnfsfs' instead of >> 'svnadmin'? Other than that the latter would have to return 'something' >> for BDB repositories. > I am wondering the same. > > We've deprecated BDB support so I think we don't need to implement it for BDB > even if the API/CLI is exposed generally, e.g. in svnadmin. So that's > probably the better place. > > Similar consideration applies to the API. I think this could be a libsvn_fs > API rather than only in libsvn_fs_fs. Agreed?
Yes,
