On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:23 PM Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > Stefan Kueng wrote on Wed, 12 Dec 2018 21:16 +0100: > > And as I repeatedly said: TSVN does validate the input as good as it > > can. But if svn does neither describe the *exact* specs in the docs nor > > provide any APIs that do that, then TSVN has to guess. > > And no: specifying that paths/uris have to be "canonicalized" is not > > enough because I do that, using the svn APIs. > > So apparently that's not enough. > > Stefan, there is nothing we can do with this information. If you have > found a value for which svn_foo_is_canonical(svn_foo_canonicalize(value)) > returns false, please tell us what that value is.
Just thinking out loud here, but could we perhaps log the non-canonical value as part of the assertion output? Instead of: line 10238: assertion failed (svn_dirent_is_absolute(local_abspath)) something like line 10238: assertion failed (svn_dirent_is_absolute(local_abspath='C:ImNotCanonical')) That way, we would at least have some concrete information ... -- Johan
