Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, 05 Oct 2018 14:28 +0000: > It should instead do two things: one, fetch the log message of the > mentioned revision(s) (r1842260) and pass it through the existing > "Extract CHANGES summary" logic; two, parse the STATUS entry embedded in > the log message, as in the attached example. The script could do either > or these, or even do both and let the RM combine the two versions. > > Any volunteers to implement this?
r1842930 implements the "Extract from STATUS" part of this.
