Julian Foad wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
> > > One important thing I didn't make clear: I propose these APIs go in 
> > > "public" headers like svn_client.h, not in the "private" header files 
> > > that are by default omitted from installation.
> 
> There's a nomination in the STATUS file for this change, now.
> 
> Can anyone please review or otherwise comment on it?

It's approved and backported now. Thanks, Brane and Bert.

The 1.11 release is unblocked.


> > [...] The key thing was we needed to move them 
> > out of the strong compatibility rules, and using the existing "__" 
> > namespace is sufficient for that.
> > 
> > > Stefan, does this make a difference to you? Do you still need to change 
> > > TSVN build scripts at all for that case? And how will the warnings work 
> > > out for you in that case? I'd really like to hear how this affects you 
> > > so we can come to a satisfactory solution.

-- 
- Julian

Reply via email to