On 10.08.2018 14:30, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 10.08.2018 13:37, Markus Schaber wrote: >> Hi, Tom, >> >> Von: Thomas Singer <thomas.sin...@syntevo.com> >> On 2018-08-10 9:52, Branko Čibej wrote: >>> On 10.08.2018 09:44, Stefan Sperling wrote: >>>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 08:44:08AM +0200, Thomas Singer wrote: >>>>> When trying to commit to a sourceforge repository using a >>>>> self-compiled SVN binary, I'm getting following error: >>>>> >>>>> D:\temp\irrlicht>svn.exe commit --username HinzKunz -m "a message" >>>>> Authentication realm: <https://svn.code.sf.net:443> SourceForge User >>>>> Password for 'HinzKunz': ************ >>>>> svn: E000013: Commit failed (details below): >>>>> svn: E000013: Can't create directory >>>>> '/svn/p/irrlicht/code/db/transactions/5634-1.txn': Permission denied >>>>> >>>>> Could this mean that we have built the SVN binary incomplete >>>>> (missing a part that is required for committing to sourceforge but >>>>> not other SVN repositories)? How can I get some helpful logging? Thanks >>>>> in advance. >>>>> >>>> I believe you'll need to ask sourceforge about this. This looks like >>>> a server-side problem and there is nothing an SVN client could do about it. >>> More specifically, it looks like filesystem permissions on the >>> repository storage are incorrect. >> Thanks. That's what I thought initially, too, simply guessing from the error >> message. But the user who reported the problem writes that with his default >> SVN binaries the commit succeeded for him, and I'm not sure that's it's not >> a problem with our SVN binaries. >> >> Is it possible that there's a difference in protocols? >> >> If the one user uses https://, and the other uses svn:// or svn+ssh:// >> protocols, the server side has different software, probably running under >> different user account and permissions. > Of course, but it's still the server administrators responsibility to > make things work (i.e., set process/file ownership and permissions > correctly) if they support both http:// and svn:// protocols. Nothing on > the client side can affect that.
By the way: the protocol used is determined by the working copy, not by the client software; unless some info is missing from your report, both clients are using the same protocol. -- Brane
