On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Julian Foad <julianf...@apache.org> wrote: > Can others approve or comment on this reduced plan please, especially those > who +1'd the previous statement ( http://svn.apache.org/r1834111 ) which I > now think was too onerous? > > Stefan Sperling wrote: >> I would prefer having just the minimum requirements we are going >> to fullfill written down. What you wrote above makes sense to me. >> I don't see a problem with making decisions to over-deliver on >> these written promises on a case-by-case basis as we see fit. > > Suggested wording: > > [[[ > Subversions delivers two kinds of stable releases: > > * Long Term Support (LTS): > - release every 2 years; 4 years support; emphasis on stability > * standard: > - release every 6 months; 6 months support; emphasis on features > > Support means we will fix critical issues (security/corruption). We may also > sometimes fix other issues as appropriate to the emphasis of each release. > ]]] > > I also invite suggestions for a better name than "standard" for the 6-month > releases. ("Quick", "unstable", "enthusiast", ...) > > - Julian
Yes, +1 on this lighter proposal. -- Johan
