Karl Fogel wrote on Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 16:52:39 -0600: > Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> writes: > >It would be useful to also print the caught exception in case it contains > >more > >specific information about the cause of the problem… > > > >… but in that case, why not remove the try/except entirely? > > That's a good point. I already committed my original proposed change in > r1824080. Would you like to follow up with a removal of the try/except?
Done: r1824690.
