On 14.09.2017 14:47, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 14.09.2017 11:48, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> My opinion: don't allow upgrading individual externals-sub-wc's. It's >> all or nothing IMHO. > That's the way I'm leaning, too. I do have to figure out if the code for > that is already in place, or whether I need some more wc-fu to invent it. :)
$ svn st X foo Performing status on external item at 'foo': svn: E155021: This client is too old to work with the working copy at '/Users/brane/src/svn/test/bar/foo' (format 32). You need to get a newer Subversion client. For more details, see http://subversion.apache.org/faq.html#working-copy-format-change The upgrade of the foo external working copy (using the client from the better-pristines branch) worked without a hitch. So we currently do not have any logic in the code to prevent partial upgrades or, in other words, to prevent mixed-format working copies. This needs fixing ... preferably on trunk. -- Brane