Evgeny Kotkov <evgeny.kot...@visualsvn.com> writes: > Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> writes: > >> "local network" is a rather blurry concept. >> This will often return FALSE for local wireless connections, for >> example, because of shared medium contention. >> >> I agree that 5msec is a well chosen latency threshold. >> But why not name this function after the question it answers, >> e.g. svn_ra_serf__is_low_latency_connection()? > > My original intention here was to have a function that can distinguish > between LAN and WAN, using the information that we have — that's > latency now and possibly something else in the future. But indeed, > considering local wireless connections, the name of the function could > be misleading. > > Something like svn_ra_serf__is_low_latency_connection() would probably > be more appropriate right now. And, we could deal with the additional > information about the connection to base the detection on, if and when > we have that. > > I'll try to update the function name and the related comments.
Committed in https://svn.apache.org/r1803989 Regards, Evgeny Kotkov
