The page I'm talking about is the skinny one that presents directory listings:
<html><head><title>svnRepo1 - Revision 195: /</title></head> <body> <h2>svnRepo1 - Revision 195: /</h2> <ul> <li><a href="../">..</a></li> <li><a href="a/">a/</a></li> </ul> <hr noshade><em>Powered by <a href="http://subversion.apache.org/";>Apache Subversion</a> version 1.9.5 (r1770682).</em> </body></html> It would be super awesome to be able to administrators of Subversion to inject JavaScript into the pages presenting subversion directory listings to regular user agents. And configure that injection via something in a config file, that would end up like this in the browser: <html><head><title>svnRepo1 - Revision 195: /</title> <script src="foo.com/something.js"></script></head> <body> <h2>svnRepo1 - Revision 195: /</h2> <ul> <li><a href="../">..</a></li> <li><a href="a_file">a</a></li> </ul> <hr noshade><em>Powered by <a href="http://subversion.apache.org/";>Apache Subversion</a> version 1.9.5 (r1770682).</em> </body></html> Or better still be able to override the template used for the page in question - again in config. It would also be nice to be able to insert something into the resource as served to humans too, but right now that's served raw. It would be nice to have a serving of the same resource via a template. The default would be raw as it is now in the absence of the config setting. I're looked but I can't see config for this that already exists. With the consent of the developer team, I'd like to raise a Jira feature request. *History* Here's me doing something similar a year ago for RhodeCode - https://paulhammant.com/2016/06/26/using-rhodecode-and-angular1-as-an-editor-for-a-config-as-code-system/ And a year before that for GitHub (as a Chrome Extension) https://paulhammant.com/2015/06/07/custom-json-editors-for-github/ Now those two are for enhanced *editing* experience, but right now for base subversion, I'm proposing something that may only affect *viewing* experience. I have shown a single <script/> insert, when in reality it would be insert-n-lines-into the <head/> tag, or override the the template thing.
