stef...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 22:13:57 -0000:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sun Oct 30 22:13:57 2016
> New Revision: 1767190
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1767190&view=rev
> Log:
> Add a RA-level function for svn_repos_list and use that to implement
> svn_client_list, if the server should support the new API.
>
> Right now, no RA layer actually implements the new API; this will be
> done in follow-up commits.
>
> * subversion/include/svn_ra.h
> (svn_ra_dirent_receiver_t,
> svn_ra_list): Declare the new interface.
> (SVN_RA_CAPABILITY_LIST): Declare a new server capability.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_ra/ra_loader.h
> (svn_ra__vtable_t): Add LIST function.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_ra/ra_loader.c
> (svn_ra_list): Implement the new API and check for its availability.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_client/list.c
> (receiver_baton_t,
> list_receiver): RA-layer-compatible wrapper around the client callback.
> (list_internal): If we don't have to fetch any properties, use the new
> RA-layer API, if available. Explicitly checking the
> existance of the base path is only needed if we use
> the client-side code.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_ra_local/ra_plugin.c
> (ra_local_vtable): Update vtable.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/serf.c
> (serf_vtable): Same.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_ra_svn/client.c
> (ra_svn_vtable): Same.
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra/ra_loader.c Sun Oct 30 22:13:57 2016
> @@ -645,6 +645,29 @@ svn_error_t *svn_ra_get_dir2(svn_ra_sess
> path, revision, dirent_fields, pool);
> }
>
> +svn_error_t *
> +svn_ra_list(svn_ra_session_t *session,
> + const char *path,
> + svn_revnum_t revision,
> + apr_array_header_t *patterns,
> + svn_depth_t depth,
> + apr_uint32_t dirent_fields,
> + svn_ra_dirent_receiver_t receiver,
> + void *receiver_baton,
> + apr_pool_t *scratch_pool)
> +{
> + SVN_ERR_ASSERT(svn_relpath_is_canonical(path));
> + if (!session->vtable->list)
> + return svn_error_create(SVN_ERR_RA_NOT_IMPLEMENTED, NULL, NULL);
Judging by its error message, SVN_ERR_RA_NOT_IMPLEMENTED is supposed to
mean "protocol scheme not recognised", not "feature not supported".
I think this should use SVN_ERR_UNSUPPORTED_FEATURE instead, like
svn_ra__assert_capable_server() does.
(There are a few more instances of this mixup in libsvn_ra_svn/client.c.)
> +
> + SVN_ERR(svn_ra__assert_capable_server(session, SVN_RA_CAPABILITY_LIST,
> + NULL, scratch_pool));
> +
> + return session->vtable->list(session, path, revision, patterns, depth,
> + dirent_fields, receiver, receiver_baton,
> + scratch_pool);
> +}
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/list.c Sun Oct 30 22:13:57 2016
> @@ -221,6 +221,53 @@ get_dir_contents(apr_uint32_t dirent_fie
> @@ -324,6 +365,33 @@ list_internal(const char *path_or_url,
> + /* Try to use the efficient and fully authz-filtered code path. */
> + err = svn_ra_list(ra_session, "", loc->rev, patterns, depth,
> + dirent_fields, list_receiver, &receiver_baton, pool);
> +
> + if ( svn_error_find_cause(err, SVN_ERR_UNSUPPORTED_FEATURE)
> + || svn_error_find_cause(err, SVN_ERR_RA_NOT_IMPLEMENTED))
... and then the second disjunct here will be able to be removed.
Cheers,
Daniel
