On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 03:31:22PM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:34:19PM -0000, s...@apache.org wrote:
> > Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/conflicts.c
> > URL: 
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/conflicts.c?rev=1764447&r1=1764446&r2=1764447&view=diff
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/conflicts.c (original)
> > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/conflicts.c Wed Oct 12 
> > 12:34:18 2016
> > @@ -5666,6 +5726,18 @@ diff_file_added(const char *relpath,
> >                              FALSE, FALSE, scratch_pool));
> >    SVN_ERR(svn_io_check_path(local_abspath, &on_disk_kind, scratch_pool));
> >  
> > +  if (db_kind == svn_node_file && db_kind == svn_node_file)
> 
> Coverity noticed both sides of the && are the same.  Should one side be
> "on_disk_kind == svn_node_file" instead?
> 

Yes indeed, it should. Thanks! I'll fix this when I find time
if it's not already been fixed by then.

> Cheers,
> -- 
> James
> GPG Key: 4096R/91BF BF4D 6956 BD5D F7B7  2D23 DFE6 91AE 331B A3DB

Reply via email to