Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> writes: > I suggest to change behavior to something like the following: > [[[ > $ svn resolve > Searching tree conflict details for > 'D:\ivan\svn\test-wc\add-versus-add\foo' in repository: > Checking r5... done > Tree conflict on 'D:\ivan\svn\test-wc\add-versus-add\foo': > File merged from '^/trunk/foo@2' to '^/branches/b1/foo@16' was moved > to '^/branches/b1/bar' by ivan in r5. > A file which differs from the corresponding file on the merge source > branch was found in the working copy. > > Resolution options: > (p) - postpone > (r) - mark as resolved > (m) - move and merge > (h) - help > (q) - postpone all remaining conflicts
I'd love to see the layout like this: Resolution options: (p) Postpone (r) Mark as resolved (m) Move and merge (h) Help (q) Postpone all remaining conflicts Which changes to this, if the user selects "Help": Resolution options: (p) Postpone (skip this conflict and leave it unresolved) [postpone] (r) Mark as resolved (accept current working copy state) [working] (m) Move and merge (move '^/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/foo' to 'subversion\libsvn_client\bar' and merge) (h) Help (q) Postpone all remaining conflicts Regards, Evgeny Kotkov