Stefan Hett <luke1...@posteo.de> writes:

> Would this (and your other two commits) be something which should be
> considered to backport to 1.9 (and maybe even 1.8)? As far as I was
> following the history of this, it sounds like a reasonable improvement
> worth for a backport, no?

Sure, I'll nominate them tomorrow.


Regards,
Evgeny Kotkov

Reply via email to