On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 1:59 PM, <s...@apache.org> wrote: > Author: stsp > Date: Tue May 26 11:59:35 2015 > New Revision: 1681744 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1681744 > Log: > * site/publish/faq.html > (dav-slow-copy): Mention that this is fixed as of 1.8.11. > > Modified: > subversion/site/publish/faq.html > > Modified: subversion/site/publish/faq.html > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/site/publish/faq.html?rev=1681744&r1=1681743&r2=1681744&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- subversion/site/publish/faq.html (original) > +++ subversion/site/publish/faq.html Tue May 26 11:59:35 2015 > @@ -4380,7 +4380,7 @@ This behaviour is present in <b>Apache h > and <b>2.4.6 (or higher)</b> – older versions of httpd are not > affected. > Branching/tagging a large tree may take several minutes because of this.</p> > > -<p>Until a fix is available, you can use the following workaround to make > +<p><b>This problem has been fixed in Subversion 1.8.11.</b> You can also use > the following workaround to make > mod_dav skip the unnecessary work; add the following directives to the Apache > configuration on the server, preferably only inside the Location blocks > configured for SVN:</p>
Hi Stefan, FYI, I just changed the "fix version" you added to the above FAQ entry: it was fixed in 1.8.14, not in 1.8.11. Rereading the history of the mail thread, jira issue and commits: the excessive memory usage mentioned in SVN-4531 was indeed fixed in 1.8.11, but the O(tree) behaviour remained. That was fixed in r1674627 by you, by implementing a workaround I had suggested, inside mod_dav_svn's code. That fix was then backported to 1.8.14 (and 1.9.0, which was already branched at the time). [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-4531 [2] http://svn.apache.org/r1674627 -- Johan
