Sounds good in general, but would it be better to just create a new page and leave existing one in tact so that links to entries all remain functional?
Also, it might be a better question for users@ list. I cannot think of any reason for a dev to object to someone who wants to put in the effort. Users might have more feedback on what is still valuable. Mark > On Jun 21, 2016, at 7:20 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think our FAQ is a bit of a mess (with all due respect to the people > who have contributed to it over the years -- time has just taken its > toll). Some questions are no longer relevant for recent releases (e.g. > documented workarounds for problems that have since been fixed; or > referring to BDB or subversion 1.0 or ...). > > I'd like to clean it up a bit: > 1) Move anything only relevant to old releases (anything < 1.9 or < > 1.8 (?)) to a separate page (faq_old.html or something -- linked from > the main faq with a link somewhere at the top "Questions about older > releases"). > > 2) Remove some questions that are unlikely to be relevant / > interesting anymore (e.g. "How is Subversion affected by the 2007 > changes in Daylight Savings Time (DST)?") > > 3) Gradually rework some answers where we have a better way of explaining. > > > Thoughts? > > I'd like to start with (1) and (2) to get at least some "less > relevant" stuff out of the way, and then do some (3)-work when / where > I feel an itch to scratch ... > Any help is greatly appreciated of course. > > -- > Johan
