On 15 May 2016 at 03:02, Stefan <luke1...@gmx.de> wrote: > On 5/15/2016 01:13, Stefan wrote: >> >> [[[ >> Add a troubleshooting section to 1.9 to help users tracing down problems >> related to proxies when locking/unlocking multiple files. >> >> * docs/release-notes/1.9.html >> (troubleshooting): Add new section including http-pipelining issue >> description. >> ]]] > > > Small correction to patchnotes: > > [[[ > Add a troubleshooting section to 1.9 to help users tracing down problems > related to proxies when locking/unlocking multiple files. > > * docs/release-notes/1.9.html > (troubleshooting): Add new section including http-pipelining issue > description. > (news): Add link to new troubleshooting section. > ]]] > I think it's better to use term "HTTP pipelining" instead of "http-pipelining" on the website. Another wording suggestion: replace ".. protocols/applications involved in processing http-pipelining." with something like ".. protocols/applications involved in processing pipelined HTTP requests."
-- Ivan Zhakov
