On 2016-03-03 10:31:52 +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > No, of course not :-). I just gave an example where the output was > broken (host not found), as opposed to another error condition (server > reponds "URL 'X' non-existent in revision Y") where the xml response > is still valid. Ignoring implementation (which I always do when I'm > arguing about behavior), this seems quite weird to me.
No, this is different. In the former case, this is a server or communication problem: it is not possible to output the info because it is not possible to know what it is. In the latter case, the communication is successful, so that it is possible to output the info. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
