Greg, In principal this is fine, yes. If the *PMC* are going to vouch for these binaries, and are willing to help support Infra if/when they are deployed.
Of course, I will re-iterate that Infra will roll back if any forward rolling is catastrophic to the service. We are also likely to want to roll up the repo, in to a tarball or some such before hitting the big red button. JIC we need to roll back, and we cannot undo svnadmin upgrade (assuming such an action is needed too). Perhaps a crash course for the PMC about the stack as is, and how we get to a deployed update is a good idea? Also, we'd like/need a JIRA issue for each bump you want (to contain any notices about steps required, or library changes and so on). Will you expect us to roll dav_svn et al each time too? If so we should ensure that your package names match those upstream in Ubuntu ( I assume James can cope with that, given his email address ;) ). On Sun, 29 Nov 2015, at 10:00 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Does this work for you, Tony? > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 10:04 PM, James McCoy > <james...@debian.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 10:53:43AM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote: >> > Is somebody still working on this? >> >> I had mentioned on IRC that I'd provide a PPA based on my Debian >> packaging. I forgot to follow up and state that it's available: >> >> https://launchpad.net/~jamessan/+archive/ubuntu/subversion >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> James >> GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <james...@debian.org> Cheers -- Tony
