On 25.11.2015 17:04, Bert Huijben wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Marc Strapetz [mailto:marc.strap...@syntevo.com] >> Sent: woensdag 25 november 2015 16:09 >> To: Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org>; dev@subversion.apache.org >> Subject: Re: JavaHL: "Not implemented" error in StatusEditor.addAbsent >> >> On 25.11.2015 10:43, Branko Čibej wrote: >>> On 25.11.2015 09:49, Marc Strapetz wrote: >>>> One of our users has reported following Exception against Subversion >>>> 1.9.2: >>>> >>>> Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Not implemented: >>>> StatusEditor.addAbsent >>>> at >>>> >> org.apache.subversion.javahl.remote.StatusEditor.addAbsent(StatusEditor.j >> ava:110) >>>> ... 15 more >>>> >>>> Actually, StatusEditor.addAbsent looks like this: >>>> >>>> public void addAbsent(String relativePath, >>>> NodeKind kind, >>>> long replacesRevision) >>>> { >>>> //DEBUG:System.err.println(" [J] StatusEditor.addAbsent"); >>>> checkState(); >>>> throw new RuntimeException("Not implemented: >> StatusEditor.addAbsent"); >>>> } >>>> >>>> Is there any more debug information I should try to collect? >>> Well, it's not implemented ... I can't think of anything more specific? >> I'm wondering whether it was not implemented by intention, because it's >> not expected to be called (same as for copy/move)? Actually, this is the >> only user who is experiencing this problem, so conditions causing this >> problem seem to be very specific. Fortunately it's currently perfectly >> reproducible for him. Should I ask for an "svn status -u" output? > This should be perfectly reproducable when you call status on a directory > that contains subdirectories that you are not allowed to read (via a > mod_authz_svn config file or similar svnserve config). > > svn status -u explicitly ignores absent nodes.
Then I guess JavaHL's status editor should do the same? -- Brane
