Stefan Hett <luke1...@gmx.de> writes: > You are absolutely right here and I should have seen that before. Didn't > take that (obvious) point into account at all. > > I'll come-up with a working version scheme which won't have potential for > causing this misinterpretation and will make sure that the next releases > will use that other scheme. > > Think the solution will either be to restart my own version numbering which > is completely independent from SVN's or go with the alternative you > presented.
Thank you :) Regards, Evgeny Kotkov
