Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> writes: > I think now is good moment to discuss whether we should merge > ra-reuse-session [1] branch to trunk or not: it's better to merge such > branch in the beginning of release cycle, to have more time to test > and dogfood.
+1 to merge. > Cons: > - In makes behavior less stable. RA session pool doesn't reuse > sessions that was unused for some time to avoid timeout issues > - There is the chance that we will try to reuse 'broken' RA session > due the bug and operation will fail Do you have a plan to fix this? Detect the error from a broken RA session and create another? Track the time when the session was last used? Something else? -- Philip Martin WANdisco
