On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> On 24.08.2015 15:32, stef...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: stefan2 > > Date: Mon Aug 24 13:32:41 2015 > > New Revision: 1697390 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1697390 > > Log: > > * STATUS: Add svnfsfs load-index fixes (r1697381, r1697384, r1697387). > > > > Modified: > > subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS > > > > Modified: subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS > > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS?rev=1697390&r1=1697389&r2=1697390&view=diff > > > ============================================================================== > > --- subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS (original) > > +++ subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS Mon Aug 24 13:32:41 2015 > > @@ -129,6 +129,15 @@ Candidate changes: > > Votes: > > +1: rhuijben > > > > + * r1697381, r1697384, r1697387 > > + Make 'svnfsfs load-index' work as advertised in the documentation > > + Justification: > > + svnfsfs load-index would only ever be used in high-stress > situations > > + like desaster recovery. So, while workarounds are possible, having > > + people jump though a few extra hoops is a bad thing in that > context. > > + Votes: > > + +1: stefan2 > > + > > I have to admit that I don't have a clue what this backport proposal is > about. What doesn't work as advertised? What kind of workarounds are we > talking about? > I documented them today in our release notes (r1697932). > According to the log messages of these three revisions, it would appear > that they're three (unrelated?) bug fixes in svnfsfs. However, I can't > find any test cases that would help me verify that the fixes actually > perform as advertised. > All 3 patches correct / deal with 'svnfsfs load-index' UI issues where the tool would feed wrong data to FSFS' private APIs. The actual internal API functionality is covered by fs-fs-private-tests. r1697967 adds a UI test. I appended it to the list. > In other words, I've no idea how to vote for this backport. > In case you want more input, clarification etc, I should be on IRC from around 0930 UTC on tomorrow. -- Stefan^2.
