Branko Čibej wrote on Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:06:47 +0200: > As discussed elsewhere, this extends the soak period to 28th July. This > would be a good time to finalize the 1.9 release notes ... please? :)
I've got this about FSFS f7 — Stefan, is it correct? (The interesting part is the second hunk's first paragraph.) Daniel [[[ * docs/release-notes/1.9.html (#new-feature-compatibility-table): Add #fsfs-improvements. (#fsfs-improvements): Document how to distinguish fully-featured/native from partially-featured/upgraded FSFS f7 repositories. ]]] [[[ Index: 1.9.html =================================================================== --- 1.9.html (revision 1691121) +++ 1.9.html (working copy) @@ -106,6 +106,12 @@ <td>any</td> <td></td></tr> <tr> + <td><a href="#fsfs-improvements">FSFS format 7</a></td> + <td>any</td> + <td>1.9</td> + <td>1.9</td> + <td>Older formats remain supported.</td></tr> + <tr> <td><a href="#FSX">FSX</a></td> <td>any</td> <td>1.9</td> @@ -306,9 +312,14 @@ 7. For best performance and to enable all features, it is recommended to perform a full <a href="http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.9/svn.reposadmin.maint.html#svn.reposadmin.maint.migrate.svnadmin"> -dump / load</a> cycle, see next section. -</p> +dump / load</a> cycle. You can tell whether all format 7 features are enabled +by looking for <tt>FSFS Logical Addressing: yes</tt> in the output of +<tt>svnadmin info</tt>: if that line is printed, then the repository has +all format 7 features enabled. +<p>The next subsection compares performance of repositories created directly as +format 7 and of repositories upgraded to format 7 from older formats.</p> + </div> <!-- fsfs-format7 --> <div class="h4" id="format7-comparison"> ]]]