On 6/2/15 3:45 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Note that Evgeny reported a regression in svn_repos_verify_fs2() in > <http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2015-05/0141.shtml>. No objections to > moving forward with rc2, but as that issue is a regression, we'll need > an rc3 that fixes it.
I know I got tired of waiting. rc1 produced valuable feedback. I figure we haven't lost much if we put out rc2 and put out rc3 with more fixes later, but we may have gained some more people looking at rc2.
