On 27 May 2015 at 19:48, Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> wrote: > Julian Foad <julianf...@btopenworld.com> writes: > >> Evgeny Kotkov wrote: >>> Philip, Julian, thank you for giving this patch a look. >>> >>> As I said in my previous e-mails, I think that the committed fix is a better >>> choice here, as opposed to attempts to achieve the same behavior using the >>> stream API. [...] >> >> That sounds good to me -- leaving the code using file APIs. > +1.
> It only fixes writing revprops during commit, it still leaves the > problem that the pack operation doesn't flush. We need to add flush > when writing the revision pack file, the packed indices, the revprop > pack file and the revprop manifest file. That means replacing more, if > not all, of the stream code in revprops.c. > I'm currently working on patch to fix packing and hotcopy code. -- Ivan Zhakov
