On 23.04.2015 18:03, Bert Huijben wrote: > Yes, break locks should be default (as it was in older versions). An > unsafe default.... > > Bert > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > From: Marc Strapetz <mailto:marc.strap...@syntevo.com> > Sent: 23-4-2015 16:44 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org <mailto:dev@subversion.apache.org> > Subject: 1.9: javahl.ISVNClient#cleanup(String) always fails with > "Attemptedto lock an already-locked dir" > > cleanup-related code which is working fine with 1.8 JavaHL starts > failing with 1.9 JavaHL. > > According to the docs, ISVNClient#cleanup(String) does not break locks, > which seems to cause the problems: > > /** > * Recursively cleans up a local directory, finishing any > * incomplete operations, removing lockfiles, etc. > * <p> > * Behaves like the 1.9 version with <code>breakLocks</code> and > * <code>includeExternals</code> set to <code>false<code>, and the > * other flags to <code>true</code>. > * @param path a local directory. > * @throws ClientException > */ > > When using ISVNClient.cleanup(path, *true*, true, true, true, false) > code works.
Looks like I incorrectly wrapped the 1.9 API for 1.8 backward compat ... thanks for finding this. http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4575 -- Brane
