On 20.03.2015 14:08, Bert Huijben wrote: > > Just a quick check, using the tag creation dates and what is in the file: > > 1.1.3 > > 1.1.4 > > 1.4.3 > > 1.4.4 > > 1.4.5 > > 1.6.8 > > 1.6.9 > > 1.6.10 > > 1.6.11 > > 1.6.12 > > 1.6.13 > > 1.6.14 > > 1.6.15 > > 1.6.16 > > 1.6.17 > > 1.6.18 > > 1.6.19 > > 1.6.20 > > 1.6.21 > > 1.6.22 > > 1.6.23 > > 1.8.6 > > 1.8.7 > > 1.8.8 > > (I probably missed a few, as I didn't automate the matching... just > the fetching) > > > > Were all released with a nonmatching date. I think 1.7 is the only > release line where we actually directly updated the year on the > branch, the year after release. (For 1.6.x we never updated anything) > > > > +1 on just releasing the releases as-is. >
And only 1.7 and 1.8 actually matter as far as the ASF is concerned. :) However, 1.8.[678] are good enough for me to change my mind. Again. -- Brane
