Philip Martin wrote: > "Bert Huijben" <b...@qqmail.nl> writes: >> BTW 500 msec is about two or three the time you expect for google page of >> results.... Why this arbritrary number? > > How do you explain the 2 and 2048 in the current code? They are all > just arbitrary numbers. Make it 100ms instead of 500ms.
Exactly. It's just a time that users will perceive as fairly short. Pick any arbitrary number you like. [...] > I'm not claiming this is the best algorithm, I just want to know if it > is the sort of thing we want. To me this algorithm seems better. - Julian
