On 27.02.2015 18:20, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 17:06:00 +0100: >> On 24.02.2015 17:01, Branko Čibej wrote: >>> UNLESS there are multiple targets or the operation depth is greater >>> than 'empty', in which case the output is a pair of (value, >>> target-path) for each (recursive) target. The target path is either >>> the (relative or absolute) path of the target or its URL. There is no >>> provision for whitespace escaping in the value. >> Here's an example of this format: >> >> $ svn info --show-item=last-changed-rev --depth=immediates . >> 1661934 . > How about changing "last-changed-rev" to "last-changed-revision"? The > longer spelling would be self-explanatory and consistent with everything > else (we don't use the term "rev" anywhere else user-facing).
Yes we do: $ svn info | grep Rev: Last Changed Rev: 1662668 > The > intended users are scripts so a longer spelling is not a problem there, > either. I don't oppose the change. We can have both spellings, too. -- Brane
