On 23.02.2015 22:56, rhuij...@apache.org wrote: > Author: rhuijben > Date: Mon Feb 23 21:56:06 2015 > New Revision: 1661797 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1661797 > Log: > * STATUS > Nominate a few things, that I think should be released in 1.9, but can > only be easily backported as a huge catch-up merge.
Bert, if you think we need a big catch-up merge before rolling the 1.9 beta, I suggest you say so here, on dev@. IRC and commit logs have a tendency to get lost in the cracks. FWIW, I don't see any reason not do do such a merge. > But I'm not sure if we should release a 1.9.0 with so many known issues, > on how you can corrupt wc.db. Surely it's better to release with known issues than with unknown issues, yet we've been doing the latter for years. :) -- Brane
