On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote:
> On 17 February 2015 at 13:24, <stef...@apache.org> wrote: > > Author: stefan2 > > Date: Tue Feb 17 10:24:09 2015 > > New Revision: 1660342 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1660342 > > Log: > > * STATUS: Refer to new backport branch for r1590751 and unblock > > that entry. > > > > Modified: > > subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS > > > > Modified: subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS > > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS?rev=1660342&r1=1660341&r2=1660342&view=diff > > > ============================================================================== > > --- subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS (original) > > +++ subversion/branches/1.8.x/STATUS Tue Feb 17 10:24:09 2015 > > @@ -133,6 +133,21 @@ Candidate changes: > > Votes: > > +1: rhuijben > > > > + * r1590751, r1660341 > > + Use empty, rather than NULL, config if default is unreadable. > > + Justification: > > + svn SEGV reported by user. > > + Branch: > > + ^/subversion/branches/1.8.x-r1590751 > > + Votes: > > + +1 (without r1660341): philip, danielsh, rhuijben > > + -0: julianfoad (prefer to fix all the programs at the same time; > > + other queries -- see email thread) > > + +1 (without r1660341): danielsh (julianf: > > + I agree with your points on list, but +1ing anyway: > > + fixing this segfault in svn need not block on > fixing > > + a similar segfault in svnadmin.) > > + > > Veto-blocked changes: > > ===================== > > > > @@ -162,20 +177,6 @@ Veto-blocked changes: > > +1: rhuijben, stefan2 > > -1: julianfoad (assertion failure on incomplete dir -- see email) > > > > - * r1590751 > > - Use empty, rather than NULL, config if default is unreadable. > > - Justification: > > - svn SEGV reported by user. > > - Votes: > > - +1: philip, danielsh, rhuijben > > - -0: julianfoad (prefer to fix all the programs at the same time; > > - other queries -- see email thread) > > - +1: danielsh (julianf: I agree with your points on list, but +1ing > anyway: > > - fixing this segfault in svn need not block on > fixing > > - a similar segfault in svnadmin.) > > - -1: kotkov (breaks the build on Windows -- should use SVN_INT_ERR() > > - instead of SVN_ERR()) > Stefan! > > Nevertheless that someone can consider this as a minor issue, you > can't just go around removing people's votes. [1] > > You may resolve it, but you have to wait for person who raised the > veto to withdrawn it once he review and test proposed solution. We > already have discussed this in the past [2] > Sorry about that! Bad commit day :/ After the backport branch mess this morning, I refrained from making any further commits today. -- Stefan^2.
