Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> writes:

> Multi-threaded application that didn't call svn_dso_initialize2()
> before creating any other pools will fail anyway under some
> circumstances. The problem with cleanup handles, not with concurrent
> initialization.

Perhaps we could fix the problem (for recent APR) by using an unmanged
pool.  I'm not sure how we would arrange for such a pool to be cleaned
up, would an atexit handler work?  Or perhaps we just accept the leak?

-- 
Philip Martin | Subversion Committer
WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*

Reply via email to