On 6 February 2015 at 16:50, Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> wrote: > On 06.02.2015 14:47, Ivan Zhakov wrote: >> On 6 February 2015 at 16:13, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com] >>>> Sent: vrijdag 6 februari 2015 14:04 >>>> To: Bert Huijben >>>> Cc: Subversion Development >>>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1657782 - /subversion/branches/reuse-ra- >>>> session/BRANCH-README >>>> >>>> On 6 February 2015 at 15:55, Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: br...@apache.org [mailto:br...@apache.org] >>>>>> Sent: vrijdag 6 februari 2015 12:10 >>>>>> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org >>>>>> Subject: svn commit: r1657782 - /subversion/branches/reuse-ra- >>>>>> session/BRANCH-README >>>>>> >>>>>> Author: brane >>>>>> Date: Fri Feb 6 11:09:54 2015 >>>>>> New Revision: 1657782 >>>>>> >>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1657782 >>>>>> Log: >>>>>> On the reuse-ra-session branch: Documentation change: Instead of >>>> expecting >>>>>> clients to manage the lifetime of idle sessions, expect that the RA cache >>>>>> implementation will take care of that itself and hide the complexity >>>>>> from the API. >>>>>> >>>>>> * BRANCH-README: >>>>>> Remove todo item about svn_client_close_all_sessions. >>>>>> Add todo item about idle session expiry. >>>>> How do we expire idle sessions if a client only uses Subversion api's >>>>> once a >>>> day? >>>>> I don't think we want to rely on timers or threads. >>>>> >>>> One solution is to record last time RA session used and check it when >>>> we're going to reuse this particular RA session. >>> That doesn't reduce the usage of limited resources to until we try to use >>> them later. >>> >> The limit on number of idle open RA sessions is already in TODO list: >> - Limit the number of idle open sessions in the cache. > > No it's not. :) > Email is slower than Subversion developers :)
-- Ivan Zhakov
