On 03.02.2015 13:28, Julian Foad wrote: > Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 03.02.2015 12:49, rhuij...@apache.org wrote: >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1656694 >>> Log: >>> Rename svn_ra_dup_session() (public api) to svn_ra__dup_session (private >> api). >> >> +1000 > Presumably you both have in mind some reason why this change is beneficial. > (I saw you discussing on IRC about it being "unsafe" or some such.) Could you > please hint at the reason for this, in the log message?
There are severe constraints on where and how one may use the duplicate session. Rather than explain them at length in docs and deal with tons of spurious bug reports, I think it's better to keep this for private use within libsvn_client; *especially* if we manage to merge the reuse-ra-session branch to trunk, where use of duplicate sessions that may be based on something that's managed by libsvn_client's session cache is far too error-prone to be useful. The RA session cache will, in most cases, make session duplication less useful anyway. -- Brane
