Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > Julian Foad wrote: >> So now we need to: >> >> * undo the merge of the 1.8.x-r1611379 branch > > +1.
r1643849. >> * re-nominate my original nomination. > > +1. r1643849 and r1643850. I down-graded all our votes (including my own) from +1 to +0 because whatever we did before voting we clearly didn't test the branch mentioned in the nomination :-( I'm now reviewing and testing the nomination, using a merge from the (now correctly) mentioned branch. - Julian
