Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 22:59:53 +0000:
> I don't see what API-consumer-level purpose having the same svn:date
> would serve; it seems to me it would suffice to guarantee
>
> r100 < r101 ≤ r102 ≤ r103 ≤ r104 ≤ r105 < r106
>
> (where "x < y" ⇔ "svn:date value of y is younger than that of x",
> and the promise regarding r106 is conditional upon that revision
> being a "normal" commit ( load operation)).
That should have said:
being a "normal" commit (not part of a load operation)).
