On 25.09.2014 11:20, Bert Huijben wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com] >> Sent: donderdag 25 september 2014 09:30 >> To: Subversion Development >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1627333 - in >> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf: blame.c commit.c get_lock.c >> lock.c log.c merge.c ra_serf.h xml.c >> >> On 24.09.2014 16:25, rhuij...@apache.org wrote: >>> Author: rhuijben >>> Date: Wed Sep 24 14:25:38 2014 >>> New Revision: 1627333 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1627333 >>> Log: >>> Tweak ra_serf report xml generation code a tiny bit to use the shorter >>> '<element />' notation for elements that are always just markers for >>> enabling a feature instead of '<element></element>'. >> You're aware that, depending on the DAV schema definition, it may not >> always be valid to convert an empty element to a void element, right? > Sure, > > But this is simply returning to the old neon form of the requests, and for > the DAV part following how they are in most example code in the RFCs. > (Slightly shrinking the requests and avoiding a very tiny bit of processing > on the server and client side...) > > This is also the reason I didn't just implement using the short form in > svn_ra_serf__add_tag_buckets().
Ack, thanks. -- Brane
