On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> wrote: >...
> We should do exactly the opposite! We should make sure that even no-op > changes always get recorded and reported consistently. You have to remember > that repository history is not only about tree snapshots, it's also about > intent and results. In other words, an audit trail is just as important as > actual repository contents. > Agreed. When you start including ACLs, then r1234 might look different to two people. And if it gets elided because it "isn't a change", then one person is going to get even more confused when the revision doesn't even appear (rather than "no visible changes"). Cheers, -g
