On 07/07/2014 10:58 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > My technical opinion that FSFS7/log addressing is slower by design, > because it's doing more (read index, then read data instead of just > read data) and only caching makes them comparable on performance to > FSFS6 repositories.
I'm coming into this kinda late and after two weeks of vacation, so please forgive me if I misunderstand the above, but is it true that FSFS7 requires some kind of non-trivial caching just to match FSFS6's performance? -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
