On 6/30/14 10:45 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: > Shouldn't that second one be '%x' too?
Yes typo on my part. Stefan already fixed it: http://svn.apache.org/r1606801
On 6/30/14 10:45 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: > Shouldn't that second one be '%x' too?
Yes typo on my part. Stefan already fixed it: http://svn.apache.org/r1606801