On 19.06.2014 17:06, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > Turn out that the ruby repo is something special > in that it has very deep histories of relatively few, > very small files combined with one huge changelog > file (the latter taking up ~75% of the repo). See > below for details. > > Also, please note that your exports contained > >500000 files. Using 16MB of cache with that > project size *may* not be an adequate setup. > Upping that to insane 256MB (roughly what 1.6 > would use anyway), gives much better numbers. > However, there is hardly a difference between > f6 and f7 in these runs.
Heh, this sound suspiciously like saying that one has to have the right test data to make v7 faster than v6. :) -- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco // Non-Stop Data e. br...@wandisco.com
