On 11/22/13, 1:49 PM, rhuij...@apache.org wrote: > Author: rhuijben > Date: Fri Nov 22 21:49:46 2013 > New Revision: 1544690 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1544690 > Log: > Fix a very ugly case in 'svn status' where 'svn status wc' and > 'svn status wc/path' could show a different status for path. > > This also makes 'svn status' always describe the highest moved_to when > there are multiple moves from a single location. > (This behavior was undefined before, but identical to what you would get with > the usual index usage in sqlite) > > This patch has the nice side effect that it resolves the most common crash > report in the current AnkhSVN version: an assertion caused by an invalid > move stored in wc.db. > > * subversion/libsvn_wc/status.c > (read_info): Move this function into wc_db.c to allow using a lock and > access to private apis. > (assemble_status): Update caller. Update moved_to usage. > (get_dir_status, > get_child_status, > svn_wc__internal_walk_status): Update caller. > > * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-queries.sql > (STMT_SELECT_MOVED_TO_NODE): New query. > > * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c > (read_children_info): Set moved_here as documented: only for op-roots. > Don't duplicate name for every higher layer. > Hook moved_to information in a linked list, to provide users all move > information. > (read_single_info, > svn_wc__db_read_single_info): New function. Based on status' read_info, > but more
[snip] More what? Seems that part of that sentence is missing. Based on the context I'm guessing more accurate?
