On 20 April 2014 22:02,  <stef...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sun Apr 20 18:02:40 2014
> New Revision: 1588812
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1588812
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c
>   (fnv1a_checksum_on_file_range): Use our standard stream / file data block
>                                   size instead of some local constant.
>
> Found by: ivan
>
> Modified:
>     subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c
>
> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c?rev=1588812&r1=1588811&r2=1588812&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c (original)
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c Sun Apr 20 
> 18:02:40 2014
> @@ -3567,7 +3567,7 @@ fnv1a_checksum_on_file_range(apr_uint32_
>                               apr_off_t size,
>                               apr_pool_t *pool)
>  {
> -  char buffer[4096];
> +  char buffer[SVN__STREAM_CHUNK_SIZE];
>
Allocating 64k on stack is not good thing imho. Currently we always
allocate such buffers from pool and this case looks like another
premature optimization.

---
Ivan Zhakov
CTO | VisualSVN | http://www.visualsvn.com

Reply via email to