On 12 April 2014 00:01, Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com> wrote: > It seems that the document in notes/ did not make it clear what > the actual problem is and how it applies to Subversion servers. > Let me try to illustrate it. > [...]
> > Should these trends be confirmed for "real" HW, networks and ra_serf, > I'd love to see this code in 1.9 - after due review and feedback. > Hi Stefan, I got the idea from original description, but thank you for explaining it one more time. Anyway my concerns are still valid and I am -1 on implementing this at FSFS layer. Especially if we're going to release Subversion 1.9 in 2014. I'm also skeptical on FSFS full texts caching. I think that caching worth only for small metadata, that doesn't consume a lot of memory but expensive to build. But that's different story. -- Ivan Zhakov CTO | VisualSVN | http://www.visualsvn.com
