On 07.04.2014 09:33, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On 2 April 2014 22:24, Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> wrote: >> On 02.04.2014 18:26, Ben Reser wrote: >> >> On 4/2/14, 4:08 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: >> >> So given these reasons I'm -1 on proposed release policy change. >> >> Can you clarify if you mean this as a veto or just a vote against. I'm a >> tad >> fuzzy if vetos apply to policy changes (maybe someone can step in here and >> remind me what applies here). >> >> >> It's not and cannot be a veto. A veto can only be raised for specific code >> changes on technical grounds. >> >> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >> > Hi Branko, > > Strictly speaking the provided link doesn't specify that this is not > and cannot be a veto since "Procedural Votes or Opinion Polls" section > is marked with "TBS".
If you want to split hairs, it has always been the policy of this project that a veto can only be raised on technical grounds. Therefore, you cannot "veto" a policy change. Your concern has been noted, the vote cancelled, and a new vote started that should address your concern. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco // Non-Stop Data e. br...@wandisco.com
