Is this a good idea? ---
[[[
Test that 'svnadmin freeze' is nestable.
This would be useful in practice as a means to easily freeze a (small)
number of repositories simultaneously. It also verifies that 'freeze'
doesn't take system-global locks.
Incidentally, this is also the first 'svnadmin freeze' test in our tree.
* subversion/tests/cmdline/svnadmin_tests.py
(freeze_freeze): New test.
(test_list): Run it.
]]]
[[[
Index: subversion/tests/cmdline/svnadmin_tests.py
===================================================================
--- subversion/tests/cmdline/svnadmin_tests.py (revision 1585428)
+++ subversion/tests/cmdline/svnadmin_tests.py (working copy)
@@ -2397,6 +2397,14 @@ def verify_packed(sbox):
svntest.actions.run_and_verify_svnadmin(None, expected_output, [],
"verify", sbox.repo_dir)
+def freeze_freeze(sbox):
+ "svnadmin freeze svnadmin freeze (some-cmd)"
+ sbox.build(create_wc=False)
+ second_repo_dir, _ = sbox.add_repo_path('backup')
+ svntest.main.run_svnadmin('freeze', sbox.repo_dir, '--',
+ svntest.main.svnadmin_binary, 'freeze', second_repo_dir, '--',
+ sys.executable, '-c', 'True')
+
########################################################################
# Run the tests
@@ -2442,6 +2450,7 @@ test_list = [ None,
load_ignore_dates,
fsfs_hotcopy_old_with_propchanges,
verify_packed,
+ freeze_freeze,
]
if __name__ == '__main__':
]]]
On re-reading the code, I wonder if I should add read_only=True to
sbox.create().. this would cause the code to freeze the shared read-only
repository, which shouldn't affect other tests in any way except perhaps
to slow them down (when BDB is in use).
