On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 01:29:25PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 03:49:46PM +0400, vita...@yourcmc.ru wrote:
> > --- a/subversion/libsvn_subr/cache-membuffer.c      2014-02-12 
> > 21:42:12.483208244 +0000
> > +++ b/subversion/libsvn_subr/cache-membuffer.c      2014-02-12 
> > 21:45:54.275215290 +0000
> > @@ -1374,7 +1374,9 @@ membuffer_cache_set_internal(svn_membuff
> >     * the old spot, just re-use that space. */
> >    if (entry && ALIGN_VALUE(entry->size) >= size && buffer)
> >      {
> > -      cache->data_used += size - entry->size;
> > +      /* not "+=" because (size - entry_size) is almost always a big 32-bit
> > +         unsigned representation of a negative value on 32-bit platforms */
> > +      cache->data_used = cache->data_used + size - entry->size;
> >        entry->size = size;
> >  
> >  #ifdef SVN_DEBUG_CACHE_MEMBUFFER
> 
> Style nit: I believe the above comment will be much less clear when read
> without its preceding context line in the diff, because the reader won't
> have an obvious way of connecting the reference to "+=" to anything.

How about casting size to apr_uint64_t instead?  That allows using the
previous += since the upcast happens on an operand instead of the result
and is a bit more self-documenting.

   cache->data_used += (apr_uint64_t)size - entry->size;

Cheers,
-- 
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <james...@debian.org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to