Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> writes: > The current behaviour is not very good. Since the low level svn_fs_lock > only handles one path there is currently a post-lock for each path, so > we need to return both the post-lock error and the lock token for each > path. > > How should it work when we have an svn_fs_lock that locks multiple > paths? Should we run the post-lock once per lock, or once per call? > It's designed to be run once per call which is why the paths are > supplied on stdin. If we run it once per call do we return any > post-lock error repeatedly with each lock token?
Perhaps the servers should swallow/ignore any post-lock errors and not return them to the client? Perhaps logging them on the server is sufficient? -- Philip Martin | Subversion Committer WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
